Image via WikipediaCan Citigroup survive? - Nov. 24, 2008: "Citi's 'slow, grudging nationalization'
Monday's massive rescue package hasn't solved Citigroup's problems, says bank analyst Christopher Whalen.
(from Fortune Magazine) -- In just a few days Citigroup went from trouble to trauma as its stock price plunged amid sweeping layoffs and deep losses on some of its more esoteric assets. When news reports swirled that the megabank was considering a sale of part or all of the company, it was clear that Citi was singing from the same hymnbook as firms like Lehman Brothers, Wachovia and AIG had before they fell. The public's only question: What would the end game look like?
Now we have our answer - a government agreement to shoulder hundreds of billions of dollars in possible losses and inject billions of dollars into the bank. FORTUNE checked in with bank analyst Christopher Whalen, co-founder of Institutional Risk Analytics and a prescient critic of Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) since 2003, when he said its riskier, higher-return strategy made it more vulnerable than its banking peers.
Here are some excerpts. This one is well worth a read of the full article.
Fortune:
Does this plan solve Citi's problems?
Whalen: This does nothing more than temper the problem, but, no, it hasn't solved anything.
Fortune:
How does this rescue plan differ from the other bailouts we've seen in the past few months?
Whalen: The accurate term for what the government has done is "open bank assistance." It's similar to what the FDIC had to do when it was clear that Wachovia could no longer go on, except there is not a ready buyer in this case. The other big financial institutions have had parties willing to pick up the assets, but you won't see that with Citi. This bailout is more like a resolution. That means that the government essentially has to take control of Citicorp and become more and more involved with its operations until the bank ultimately is nationalized.
No comments:
Post a Comment